Galileo AI

What it actually does

Nothing, as a product you can buy. Google acquired Galileo AI and relaunched it as Stitch, announced around Google I/O on May 20, 2025. Galileo AI is no longer a separate product or subscription, and usegalileo.ai now routes to Stitch. Any review, listicle or comparison page still presenting it as a purchasable tool with its own pricing, including the version of this page we ran before, is out of date.

What it did, before the acquisition, was generate UI designs from text prompts and export them to Figma with component structures, design systems and responsive layouts. That capability survived. Stitch, a Google Labs product, does text and image to UI generation with front-end code export, and it is free rather than a subscription.

One more thing worth pinning down, because it derails a lot of searches: galileo.ai is a different company entirely, an AI observability and evaluation platform, unrelated to the design tool. If you are reading about Galileo and seeing model monitoring, you are on the wrong company.

What it costs

Nothing, because you cannot buy it. Before the acquisition there was a limited free tier behind a waitlist and Pro pricing that was never finalised.

If you are here because a comparison chart quoted a Galileo AI price, that chart is describing a product that stopped existing in May 2025. The replacement, Stitch, is free to use as a Google Labs experiment. That is the whole cost picture.

Where it falls down

The acquisition is the failure, from a buyer's point of view. A tool you evaluated, waitlisted for or built a workflow around got absorbed and renamed, and the thing you assessed is not the thing available now.

Existing Galileo AI users were reportedly given 30 days to move their data to Stitch. We want to be clear about our confidence here: we saw that only in a LinkedIn search snippet attributed to co-founder Arnaud Benard, and we could not verify it on the page. Treat the 30 day figure as unconfirmed. The migration itself is not in doubt.

The replacement carries its own risk. Stitch is described as an experimental Google Labs product. Google Labs experiments are not products with support commitments or deprecation policies, and building a team workflow on one means accepting that it can change or disappear on Google's schedule with no contract behind it. Anyone who lived through the Galileo migration has already had that lesson once.

There is no independent rating to fall back on either. We found no G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Trustpilot or Product Hunt aggregate score for usegalileo.ai. If you see one quoted somewhere, check whether it is actually rating the observability company with the similar name.

The 1.5 reflects a straightforward reality: this entry exists so readers stop hunting for a product that is gone. It is not a judgement on how well the original text-to-UI generation worked.

Who should buy it

Nobody, because there is nothing to buy. If you arrived looking for Galileo AI, go to Stitch and use it free. It does the same job it always did, including front-end code export, and it costs nothing.

Do not sign up for anything claiming to be Galileo AI with a price attached. The standalone subscription does not exist, and a site selling one is either badly out of date or selling something else.

Design teams that need a supported, contracted tool for text-to-UI work should not build on Stitch either. Labs status means no guarantees, and if design generation sits on your critical path you want a vendor you can hold to something. Use Stitch for exploration and starting points, keep the production workflow in a tool with a support agreement behind it.